RSS Feed

OSS Ramblings

http://www.ossramblings.com/MCSE_dont_like_linux

 

Why MCSE's Won't Learn Linux

ZD is blogging about why many MCSE's can't or won't learn Linux.

The judgement?

"Basically, to learn Unix you learn to understand and apply a small set of key ideas and achieve expertise by expanding both the set of ideas and your ability to apply them - but you learn Windows by working with the functionality available in a specific release."

He goes on to say:

"Put a Solaris guy who’s never used Linux in front of SuSe 10 with a list of complex tasks and [...] he won’t be either intimidated or deterred; and the job will get done because he knows how the tools he needs should work

"In contrast, if you take a guy who’s grown up entirely on Windows 2003/XP and put him in front of a rack of NT 4.0 machines with a similar task list, the chances are good that he [..] won’t get the job done - because NT 4.0 isn’t 2003/XP Server and he’ll end up rationalizing that it simply doesn’t do the things he doesn’t know how to do."

In other words, to be an MCSE you memorize a specific set of functions that you perform to accomplish a particular goal. With Linux, you will more likely need to understand why you perform functions.

My take on this? It validates what I've been saying for years. Most MCSE's I know weren't worth the paper their certificate was printed on and didn't deserve a certification to begin with. Throw them in front of a computer to troubleshoot a problem that wasn't on their test and they spin their wheels for hours before either finally googling an answer or... as I've seen several times in my own (past) employees... screw it up worse.

Give me someone who runs Linux on a home machine, and I guarantee they can troubleshoot any technical problem in both Linux and Windows. Years ago, I stopped hiring based on certificates. One certificate is nice to have, but I weigh a Microsoft Certified Professional equally with an MCSE+I, etc. Just because you had the spare change and the time to memorize hundreds of rote answers doesn't make you a decent technician.



MCWCs ???

Chuck Burgess's picture

Microsoft Certified Wizard Clickers ???

Well, I'm a MCSA and I know

halfluke's picture

Well, I'm a MCSA and I know that many colleagues just prepare the exams memorizing test questions without even reading the books.
I probably agree about a superior knowledge of a Linux system engineer compared to a Microsoft one.
I'm just not sure about the fact that a Linux engineer could perform better than a Microsoft one on a Windows system, and that's because:
when everything is GUI, your control is very low.
I think that someway the trial and error method is inborn in Windows system, as they are 'closed source'.

Just my two cents.

I think people who use Linux

Benjie Gillam's picture

I think people who use Linux often do it after they have mastered Windows as a power user, and found that it still doesn't do everything they want it to, or how they want it to. Find yourself a decent Linux tinkerer, and you've probably found a ex-Windows power-user.

How many OSs do you know?

Richard Chapman's picture

It serves users and administrators to have a bedrock of consistency across time and updates. It serves the vendor (the vendor with no competition), their affiliates and ancillary providers to create a clean break between versions and start anew.

There's a kind of selective ignorance I see Windows-only people hiding behind. They want to believe that once a person has committed themselves to using Linux, they suddenly forget everything they've experienced with Windows for the last 10 years.

The vast majority of Linux users were once Windows users. That doesn't make Windows into a kind of Linux training ground. In fact there are some bad habits that need to be unlearned (case sensitivity for example). In other words, Linux users are effectively dual OS users. The same is not true for Windows users and no, playing with a LiveCD or testing Linux on a PIII for a few weeks doesn't count as experience.

If you're a Windows user, understand that I use Linux not because I've contracted some rare disease or because IBM is paying me to or because I have an irrational hatred for Bill Gates. I use Linux because for me, it works much better than the other OS I was using. Care to guess what it was?

Was it AmigaOS? :-)

tony's picture

Was it AmigaOS?

:-)

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
If you have a Gravatar account, used to display your avatar.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
Are you a BOT? What's this say?
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.

 
 
 




Image 01 Image 02 Image 03